The assigned
article for this week by Carter (2005) focuses on Cybercity as a social platform where a whole of virtual
community was developed online, people are free to come and interact within
this online social space. The author observes how members interact with one
another and what are the underlying values that allow and enable members to
become so engaged with the community.
The notion of virtual community includes a group of people who tend to build relationships with one another via computer-mediated communication, regardless of geographical distances (Rheingold, 1991)
In brief,
a virtual community is perceived as a cyberspace system in which people with
shared goals and needs are engaged regardless of where people are located.
As a
traveler and an individual who has a significantly offline and present life,
the only virtual and online community that I actually am a part of is
Couchsurfing. By definition, it is an online platform for travelers all over
the world to get in contact with another, it also encourages communications
between prospective travellers and potential hosts at destinations. The primary
purpose is travelers finding free accommodation offered by the hosts while
exchanging culture, language, stories and experiences. That has entailed with
many other by-products such as friendships, meeting with local people, a new
genuine way of traveling, etc.
Different
from Cybercity, Couchsurfing's online platform is only the initial stage of
social interactions whereas most of the main interactions are moved offline and
take place there. However, in order for members to actually meet offline, a
significant part of identity, self-presentation and trust has to be involved.
Members who wish to meet with fellow Couchsurfers have to carefully go through
their profiles with pictures, details of preferences, personal philosophies and
a system of validation through references left by those who have interacted
with them before. Thus Couchsurfing is said to have both a
virtual and real element of community, we must look at how virtual and real
communities are defined.
Relating
to one of the main findings in Carter (2005)’s articles, participants of the Cybercity
virtual community find it valuable and important that: You get
to know each other from the inner person and out [online] – in real life you
know people from outside and later inside. So in that way the two are
composite. And knowing the inner person first – you see that looks aren’t that
important.
This is also especially true for the community of
Couchsurfing, it has evolved to be more than just free accommodation, in order
for the surfers and hosts to have a pleasant experience, both parties have the
initiative to look for and carefully scan the profiles of one another to ensure
that the other parties are compatible and have at least some potential of
connection when interacting. Thus, looks and appearances don’t play a big
factor in connecting people
And while interacting, topics such as knowledge,
traveling experiences, cultural and language exchange often come up. It also
takes a certain level of trust, kindness and openness for most of people to
actually join the Couchsurfing community (opting out those who treat the site
as a dating platform or any other different purposes). Thus it can be an
opportunity to empower individuals and groups of people by providing them with
the social skills, life experiences that they can harness to effectively change
their own community (in this specific regards, the hospitality and kindness
towards others), fitting in with the concept of “community development”.
Specifically,
empirical evidence based on a virtual community (CouchSurfing.com) demonstrates
that the opportunity to de-velop relationships between potential travellers and
locals has gradually increased.
Community
development should be understood as being more than economic empowerment: it is
the recognition of the solidarity of communities to act in order to better
their circumstances, whether the communities are real or virtual, and whether
their circumstances find them in the global north or the global south. A CSer
perhaps put it best: "Couchsurfing helps to eliminate the "us"
vs "them" in the world. It creates a world of "we"."
An overwhelming majority of respondents said that couchsurfing.org had “changed
their lives.” It is no small coincidence that these are the words used to
describe this virtual travel community. Couchsurfing.org is an intriguing project
that could have important implications for the future of travel and
cross-cultural exchange.
I think you have searched for a very good example of what the concept of community is for Carter. It shows how online and offline worlds can be interrelated by this kind of accommodation.
ReplyDeleteBut even though this platform is very popular and valuable, isn't it relying too much on the fact that all the information posted is true and users must believe it? The online world can be very tricky and sometimes dangerous in this cases.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6013980/Man-accused-of-raping-woman-he-met-on-couchsurfing.com-website.html